Skip to main content
. 2014 Oct 8;9(10):e110029. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110029

Table 2. Analyses of molecular variance (AMOVA) of Dioscorea humilis populations based on microsatellite data.

Source of variation (groups) Sum of squared deviations (SSD) d.f. Variance components % of the total variance
1. Dioscorea humilis s.l.
Among populations 443.049 16 0.39637 19.03
Within populations 1852.940 1099 1.68602 80.97
2. Taxonomic membership: humilis (Dhh01-Dhh15) vs . polyanthes (Dhp01. Dhp02)
Among groups 150.915 1 0.53219 21.37
Among populations within groups 292.314 15 0.27222 10.93
Within populations 1852.940 1099 1.68602 67.70
3. Dioscorea humilis subsp. humilis s.l.
Among populations 288.727 14 0.29176 15.00
Within populations 1589.255 961 1.65375 85.00
4. Geographical membership of D. humilis subsp. humilis : northern (Dhh01–08), vs . southern (Dhh09–15)
Among groups 133.969 1 0.25056 12.15
Among populations within groups 154.758 13 0.15781 7.65
Within populations 1589.255 961 1.65375 80.20
5. Genetic membership (excluding D. humilis susbp. polyanthes ): cluster Dhh01, Dhh05, Dhh07-Dhh08 vs . cluster Dhh02-Dhh04, Dhh06 vs . Dhh09-Dhh10 vs . Dhh11-Dhh15
Among groups 194.783 3 0.23571 11.81
Among populations within groups 93.944 11 0.10659 5.34
Within populations 1589.255 961 1.65375 82.85