Skip to main content
. 2014 Sep 30;14:242. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-14-242

Table 2.

Percentage of overweight members of the clusters for T1 and T2

Cluster N T1 T2 T2-T1 McNemar Chi 2 p
Cluster 1 87 19.5% 21.8% + 2.3% 0.5 .480
Cluster 2 210 14.3% 20.5% + 6.2% 5.12 .024
Cluster 3 89 24.7% 39.3% + 14.7% 8.05 .004
Cluster 4 170 14.1% 21.2% + 7.2% 6.55 .011
Total 556 16.7% 23.9% + 7.2% 19.05 < .001