Table 3.
Anopheles gambiae s.s. |
Anopheles arabiensis |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Genotype count |
Allelic frequency |
Genotype count |
Allelic frequency |
|||||||||
Site | N | RR | RS | SS | R | S | N | RR | RS | SS | R | S |
Handeni | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.000 | 1.000 | 24 | 0 | 0 | 24 | 0.000 | 1.000 |
Dar es Salaam | 9 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 0.000 | 1.000 | 16 | 0 | 13 | 3 | 0.406 | 0.594 |
Babati | 12 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 0.000 | 1.000 | 13 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 0.115 | 0.885 |
Muheza | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0.000 | 1.000 | 20 | 0 | 8 | 12 | 0.200 | 0.800 |
Muleba | 21 | 0 | 3 | 18 | 0.071 | 0.929 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0.375 | 0.625 |
Mvomero | 0 | * | * | * | * | * | 25 | 0 | 3 | 22 | 0.060 | 0.940 |
Moshi | 0 | * | * | * | * | * | 25 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 0.000 | 1.000 |
Arumeru | 0 | * | * | * | * | * | 25 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 0.000 | 1.000 |
Magu | 0 | * | * | * | * | * | 25 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 0.000 | 1.000 |
Lushoto | 25 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 0.000 | 1.000 | 0 | * | * | * | * | 1.000 |
Kilombero | 0 | * | * | * | * | * | 25 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 0.000 | 1.000 |
Uyui | 25 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 0.000 | 1.000 | 0 | * | * | * | * | * |
Kyela | 0 | * | * | * | * | * | 25 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 0.000 | 1.000 |
Dodoma Rural | 25 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 0.000 | 1.000 | 0 | * | * | * | * | * |
RR, RS and SS are three possible kdr genotypes, where R represents the resistant L1014S allele and S represents the susceptible wild-type allele.
No member of a particular species were found in molecular identification, that is, all were identified as either An. gambiae s.s. or An. arabiensis.