Table 5.
Comparison between the proposed scheme and reviewed schemes.
| Scheme | ROI-based | Embedding distortion inside ROI | Spotting tampers inside ROI | Accurate identification of tampered blocks | Recovery of tampered blocks inside ROI or image |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zain and Fauzi [2] | No | — | No | No | With average intensity of blocks |
| Wu et al. [6] | Yes | No | No | No | With JPEG compressed form of ROI |
| Chiang et al. [7] | Yes | No | No | No | With average intensity of blocks |
| Liew and Zain [3], Liew et al. [4] | Yes | Yes | No | No | With average intensity of blocks |
| Memon et al. [15] | Yes | Yes | No | No | No |
| Tjokorda Agung and Permana [5] | Yes | Yes | No | No | With average intensity of blocks |
| Al-Qershi and Khoo [8] | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | With compressed form of ROI |
| Al-Qershi and Khoo [17] | Yes | No | Yes | No | With original pixels of blocks |
| Al-Qershi and Khoo [16] | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | With compressed form of ROI |
| Deng et al. [9] | No | — | No | No | With linear interpolation of pixels of blocks |
| Kim et al. [19] | No | — | No | No | With average intensity of blocks |
| Proposed method | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | With original pixels of blocks |