Table 2.
Baseline and follow-up results for physical activity, screen media consumption, soft drink consumption, and breakfast skipping.
Intervention | Control | Total | |
---|---|---|---|
(n = 954) | (n = 782) | (n = 1736) | |
Physical activitya | |||
Baseline, n (%) | 216 (26.8) | 183 (27.6) | 399 (27.1) |
Follow-up, n (%) | 231 (29.1) | 177 (26.5) | 408 (27.9) |
Screen media consumptionb | |||
Baseline, n (%) | 122 (14.5) | 83 (12.0) | 205 (13.4) |
Follow-up, n (%) | 104 (12.7) | 100 (14.6) | 204 (13.6) |
Follow-up (girls only)∗, n (%) | 40 (9.8) | 47 (14.2) | 87 (11.3) |
Follow-up (no migration background)∗, n (%) | 49 (9.3) | 62 (12.8) | 111 (11.2) |
Follow-up (low parental education)∗, n (%) | 70 (13.9) | 75 (17.3) | 145 (16.1) |
Soft drink consumptionc | |||
Baseline, n (%) | 207 (24.5) | 156 (22.5) | 363 (23.6) |
Follow-up, n (%) | 178 (21.8) | 152 (22.1) | 330 (22.0) |
Breakfast skippingd | |||
Baseline, n (%) | 110 (13.0) | 89 (12.8) | 199 (12.9) |
Follow-up, n (%) | 101 (12.4) | 100 (14.5) | 201 (13.4) |
Follow-up (grade 2 only)∗, n (%) | 42 (10.8) | 53 (16.6) | 95 (13.5) |
aMVPA on ≥4 days/week ≥60 min/day (MVPA: moderate to vigorous physical activity); bscreen media ≥1 h/day; csoft drinks ≥1 time/week; dregular breakfast skipping.
∗Significant difference, P ≤ 0.05.