Skip to main content
. 2014 Sep 2;11:42. doi: 10.1186/1743-7075-11-42

Table 1.

Energy expenditure contributions (Mean ± SD) from FAO (EEFAO) and CHO (EECHO) at submaximal intensities in YM compared with PLC (all P < 0.001, ANOVA main effects)

Exercise Intensity
%V˙O2peak
 EE FAO- PLC kJ. min -1 (kcal.min -1 ) EE FAO- YM kJ. min -1 (kcal.min -1 ) EE CHO- PLC kJ. min -1 (kcal.min -1 ) EE CHO- YM kJ. min -1 (kcal.min -1 )
40
 9.97 ± 3.27 (2.38 ± 0.78)
 13.08 ± 3.73 (3.13 ± 0.90)
 9.92 ± 3.27 (2.37 ± 0.78)
 6.15 ± 4.19 (1.47 ± 1.00)
50
 9.56 ± 4.70 (2.28 ± 1.12)
 12.43 ± 4.22 (2.97 ± 1.00)
 16.74 ± 5.57 (4.00 ± 1.33)
 12.60 ± 4.06 (3.01 ± 0.97)
60
 6.04 ± 5.82 (1.44 ± 1.39)
 9.56 ± 5.92 (2.28 ± 1.41)
 27.54 ± 7.95 (6.58 ± 1.90)
 22.60 ± 8.00 (5.40 ± 1.91)
70 0.78 ± 6.68 (0.10 ± 1.00) 4.01 ± 7.69 (0.96 ± 1.83) 42.11 ± 9.33 (10.06 ± 2.23) 37.13 ± 13.48 (8.87 ± 3.22)