Table 2.
WT | Relative concentration (%, ML) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Proportion of thioacidolysis monomers | ||||
H | G | S | S/G ratio | |
ND | ND | ND | ND | |
pBI-intron | 0.19 ± 0.04 | 3.83 ± 0.05 | 3.65 ± 0.11 | 0.95 ± 0.04 |
pBI-FaCCRi | 0.14 ± 0.09 | 2.50 ± 0.37* | 3.38 ± 0.21 | 1.36 ± 0.12* |
pBI-FaCADi | 0.08 ± 0.02* | 2.55 ± 0.08* | 2.85 ± 0.17* | 1.12 ± 0.10 |
pBI-FaPODi | 0.13 ± 0.02 | 3.93 ± 0.01 | 4.09 ± 0.27 | 1.04 ± 0.07 |
pBI-FaCCR | 0.17 ± 0.03 | 4.02 ± 0.22 | 4.29 ± 0.03* | 1.07 ± 0.05 |
pBI-FaCAD | 0.16 ± 0.02 | 3.41 ± 0.23 | 4.17 ± 0.44 | 1.22 ± 0.05* |
pBI-FaPOD | 0.10 ± 0.004 | 2.62 ± 0.01* | 3.19 ± 0.03* | 1.22 ± 0.02* |
For each treatment, fruits (120 ± 20 g) were pooled to extract lignin. Values are the means ± s.e.m. of duplicates of two independent analyses from the pooled lignin. ML, monomeric lignin; ND, not detected. One asterisk (
) indicates significant differences by Student t-test (P < 0.01) in comparison with pBI-inron and another treatment.