Skip to main content
. 2014 Oct 8;55(10):6272–6279. doi: 10.1167/iovs.14-14648

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Refractive development of Gnat1−/− mice. (A) Refractive error plotted across age for WT and Gnat1−/− mice shows that Gnat1−/− mice refractions change little across the experimental period compared to WT (2-way repeated ANOVA, F(7,336) = 9.33, P < 0.001). (B) Axial length measurements in WT and Gnat1−/− mice increased with age, but were not statistically different (2-way repeated ANOVA, main effect of age, F(8,154) = 2.17, P = 0.034). Holm-Sidak post hoc comparisons ***P < 0.001. Symbols represent mean ± SEM.