Table 1. Characteristics Determining Program Scope and Stringency.
Program | Extent of Authority | Payers Covered | Scope of Analysis During Review | Compliance Mechanisms | Coordination with Planning Program |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Arizona | Least extensive | Blue Cross Commercial insurers Self pay | Subjective review | Voluntary (public disclosure) | Informal |
Connecticut | Moderate | Commercial insurers Self pay | Sequential screens applied to budget, clusters of departments, and departments | Mandatory | Formal |
Maryland | Extensive | All payers | Department-level screens and adjustments | Mandatory (cumulative) | Counter |
Massachusetts Medicaid | Extensive | Medicaid | Formula-based adjustments of past adjusted expenses | Mandatory (cumulative) | Informal |
Charge-control3 | Moderate | Commercial insurers Self pay | Review of overall budget | Mandatory But limited | Informal |
Minnesota | Moderate | Blue Cross Commercial insurers Self pay | Screens applied to selected functional categories | Mandatory | Minimal |
New Jersey | Extensive | Medicaid Blue Cross | Sequential screens applied to departmental clusters, then individual departments | Mandatory (cumulative) | Formal |
New York | Most extensive | Medicaid Blue Cross Commercial insurers Self pay | Screens applied to routine expenses per day and ancillary expenses per admission | Mandatory | Formal |
Western Pennsylvania | Moderate | Blue Cross Medicare Medicaid | Screens applied to overall expenses and subjective analysis used for departmental costs | Mandatory | Minimal |
Washington | Extensive | All payers | Sequential screens applied to overall unit costs, natural expense categories, and departments | Mandatory | Formal |
Characterization based on program's ranking within various dimensions of authority, as indentified in the First Annual Report of the National Hospital Rate Setting Study (Hamilton and Walter, 1980).
Types of coordination are defined as follows: formal Involves well-defined, structured planning-regulatory interaction; Informal involves less structured interagency contact and sharing of data and other input; counter coordination occurs when the two groups frequently work at cross purposes; and minimal coordination occurs when virtually no linkages exist.
Term refers to charge paying individuals or agencies.