Skip to main content
. 1983 Spring;4(3):1–58.

Table A-12. Measures of Central Tendency and Variability for Year-to-Year Percent Changes in National Health Expenditures by Type of Expenditure, Current Dollars, 1966-19811.

Type of National Health Expenditure Measures of Variability2

Measures of Central Tendency Standard Deviation Standard Error Coefficient of Variation of The Mean3

Mean Median






  Total 12.8% 12.8% 1.5% 0.377% 0.029
Personal Health Care
(Total Systems Cost)
13.1 13.0 1.8 0.467 0.036
Hospital Care 14.3 14.7 2.0 0.517 0.036
 Community Hospital Care 15.8 16.6 2.8 0.716 0.045
  Inpatient 15.5 16.2 2.8 0.732 0.047
  Outpatient 19.0 19.3 3.6 0.919 0.048
 Federal Hospital Care 11.1 11.8 3.2 0.819 0.074
Physicians' Services 12.4 11.9 2.9 0.742 0.060
Dentists' Services 12.1 12.5 2.8 0.725 0.060
Other Professional Services 12.2 12.6 5.1 1.309 0.108
Drugs and Medical Sundries 9.3 9.2 2.1 0.537 0.058
Eyeglasses and Appliances 10.5 11.9 5.1 1.317 0.125
Nursing-Home Care 16.7 16.5 3.3 0.862 0.052
  Nursing-Home Care Excluding ICF-MR 15.9 15.1 3.5 0.905 0.057
Other Health Services 12.3 12.1 6.2 1.606 0.130
Program Administration and Net Cost of Insurance 13.8 14.6 15.3 3.949 0.286
Government Public Health Activities 14.8 15.5 6.4 1.648 0.111
Research 8.6 7.6 4.1 1.053 0.122
Construction of Medical Facilities 8.9 7.6 7.8 2.014 0.227
1

There are 16 annual percent changes for the period 1966-1981.

2

ln textbook examples, measures of variability typically measure sampling variability, that is, variations that might occur by chance because a sample of the population is surveyed. As calculated in this paper (and for typical applied time-series analyses) measures of variability also reflect variability associated with evolving causal structures and variability associated with various types of nonsampling errors such as data processing mistakes, nonresponse, misreporting by respondents, etc. The calculated measures are approximate and are meant as a general guide. It is important to keep in mind the potential dangers of extrapolating historical measures of variability into the future. That is, there can be no guarantee that future variability will replicate historical variability.

3

For cautions in using the coefficient of variation when the mean of the variable measures change, see Kish (1965, pp. 47-49).