Figure - PMC

Skip to main content

An official website of the United States government

Here's how you know

Here's how you know

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

View full-text article in PMC

. 2014 Oct 9;8:197. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00197

Search in PMC
Search in PubMed
View in NLM Catalog
Add to search

Copyright © 2014 Ordek, Proddutur, Santhakumar, Pfister and Sahin.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution and reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

PMC Copyright notice

Analysis of evoked potentials in the control animals (n = 6). Left: Evoked potential (EP) waveforms show sustained amplitudes over a 3-week period. Waveforms from 10 different recording days were superimposed from all animals. Evoked potential amplitudes (EPAs) of MF-mediated field potentials were calculated by averaging the triphasic potential amplitudes using the equation . S: mechanical stimulus. Right: average MF response amplitudes from all six animals, normalized within each animal to the mean of the first day recording. None of the days were statistically different than the others (F_(6,59) = 1.41, rmANOVA, repeated measures of 6 rats,1–2 trials from each, 8–11 trials per day). Total number of trials is shown in parenthesis for each day. NS: not significant.

Inline graphic — Analysis of evoked potentials in the control animals (n = 6). Left: Evoked potential (EP) waveforms show sustained amplitudes over a 3-week period. Waveforms from 10 different recording days were superimposed from all animals. Evoked potential amplitudes (EPAs) of MF-mediated field potentials were calculated by averaging the triphasic potential amplitudes using the equation . S: mechanical stimulus. Right: average MF response amplitudes from all six animals, normalized within each animal to the mean of the first day recording. None of the days were statistically different than the others (F_(6,59) = 1.41, rmANOVA, repeated measures of 6 rats,1–2 trials from each, 8–11 trials per day). Total number of trials is shown in parenthesis for each day. NS: not significant.