Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Oct 9.
Published in final edited form as: J Spine. 2013 Jul 27;Suppl 4:001. doi: 10.4172/2165-7939.S4-001

Table 1.

Pros and cons of surgical models. Differences in surgical models allow researchers to choose the surgical model to best study their goals.

Injury Model Pros Cons Clinical Correlates
Compression
  • Balloon

  • Spring-loaded clip

  • Modified forceps

  • Static weight

  • Control of time of application

  • Control of force of application

  • Useful to assess decompression time

  • Inexpensive

  • Decompression occurs much earlier than in clinical settings

  • Extensive lamina removal causing extensive decompression

  • Intervertebral disc burst injury

  • Determine optimal decompression time

Computer-controlled impactor contusion
  • MASCIC

  • OSU

  • Infinite Horizon

  • PinPoint

  • Reproducible lesions

  • Useful to assess demyelination and axon sparing

  • Considered most clinically relevant model

  • Expensive

  • Considered most clinically relevant model

Transection
  • Dorsal hemisection

  • Dorsal quadrant

  • Lateral hemisection

  • Dorsal column

  • Useful to assess axonal regeneration

  • Inexpensive

  • Considered less clinically relevant

  • Stab or shooting injury

  • Brown-Sequard syndrome