Skip to main content
. 2014 Oct 9;10(10):e1003845. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003845

Figure 3. Transcription rate.

Figure 3

(A) Normalized transcription rate Inline graphic (Equation 12) for a σ 70-dependent promoter as a function of the number of alternative sigma factors. The numbers of Inline graphic and cores are fixed. The blue line is for a saturated promoter (with Inline graphic M) and the cyan line for an unsaturated promoter (with Inline graphic M). (B) Comparison of model predictions (lines) with an in vitro competition experiment [29] with a fixed amount of core and σH and different amounts of Inline graphic (stars). The plot shows the transcription rate of a σH-dependent gene (normalized to the maximal value) as a function of the concentration Inline graphic. (C) The sigma-core and the holoenzyme-promoter dissociation constants (see Table 2) are determined by fitting the results of transcription rate experiments with a fixed amount of cores in the same conditions as in (B) without competition in the presence of a DNA template containing σH- and σ 70-driven genes [29], [32]. (D) When a σ 70-dependent promoter also binds another type of holoenzyme or overlaps to another promoter, Inline graphic also acts as a repressor of the σ 70-dependent transcription. (E) Normalized transcription rate of a saturated and unsaturated σ 70-dependent promoter as a function of the number of Inline graphic (blue and cyan solid lines with Inline graphic M and Inline graphic M, respectively). The dashed line show the corresponding results in the absence of repression by promoter sharing or overlapping.