Skip to main content
. 2014 Oct 2;15:384. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-384

Table 2.

Respondents’ support of clinical trial data sharing, stratified by trialist and trial characteristics

‘The clinical research community should promote and facilitate clinical trial data sharing’
Respondents Agree (%) Disagree (%) Pvalue
Overall 317 278 (88) 39 (12)
Trialist academic productivity (number of research articles published in past three years) 0.22
     1 to 10 articles 71 66 (93) 5 (7)
     11 to 25 articles 117 103 (88) 14 (12)
     >25 articles 129 109 (85) 20 (16)
Trialist geographic location 0.17*
     United States or Canada 167 141 (84) 26 (16)
     Western Europe 113 104 (92) 9 (8)
     Other 37 33 (89) 4 (11)
Trial funding source 0.07*
     Government 120 108 (90) 12 (10)
     Industry or mixed funding 152 127 (84) 25 (16)
     Other 45 43 (96) 2 (4)
Trial size 0.71
     ≤239 subjects 80 69 (86) 11 (14)
     240 to 2,016 subjects 158 141 (89) 17 (11)
     ≥2,017 subjects 79 68 (86) 11 (14)
Journal in which the trial was published 0.01*
      NEJM 113 92 (81) 21 (19)
      Lancet 70 61 (87) 9 (13)
      JAMA 43 36 (84) 7 (16)
      Annals of Internal Medicine 24 23 (96) 1 (4)
      The BMJ 53 52 (98) 1 (2)
      PLoS Medicine 14 14 (100) 0 (0)

*Fisher exact test. JAMA, Journal of the American Medical Association; NEJM, New England Journal of Medicine.