Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Oct 10.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Psychol Sci. 2013 Feb 15;1(3):223–238. doi: 10.1177/2167702612469355

Table 2.

Relationship of Combat Exposure Severity Scale and Total vulnerability with PSS onset and current PSS.

Percentilec of predictor Predictor is Combat Exposure Severityb Predictor is Total Vulnerability Count
na %with PSS onset %with Current PSS n %with PSS onset %with Current PSS
below 10th 15 0.0% 0.0% 10 4.3% 0.0%
below 25th 42 7.4% 0.2% 38 7.4% 0.5%
below 50th 95 12.8% 3.0% 84 10.1% 3.8%
above 50th 153 31.0% 19.2% 164 31.6% 17.1%
above 75th 97 46.9% 30.5% 85 53.8% 35.0%
above 90th 42 69.9% 55.4% 45 67.0% 49.6%
above 99th 4 88.5% 27.4% 6 89.4% 75.4%
Odds ratio for trend (95% CI)d 2.78 (1.67–4.64) 5.64 (2.53–12.57) 2.85 (1.89–4.31) 3.56 (2.28–5.57)
a

n’s are raw unweighted sample sizes within each weighted percentile group for combat exposure severity or total vulnerability. Weighted sample percents within each percentile category differ slightly from nominal (e.g. below 25th percentile for combat exposure severity has 28.6% of sample) due to ties at percentile cutpoints.

b

Scale created from factor analysis using the 6 combat exposure variables as indicators

c

Categories are not mutually exclusive (e.g. veterans above 90th percentile on combat exposure severity are a subset of those above 75th percentile).

d

Odds ratios corresponding to a 1 standard deviation increase in combat exposure or standardized total vulnerability.