Table 6 . Association between sugars categorization (any type) and fatty acid intake.
| Association with fatty acid (% energy or energy-adjusted basis) for population group |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Method of | ||||||
| Reference | Sugar type categorization | statistical analysis | Saturated/Trans | Monounsaturated | Polyunsaturated | |
| (Farris et al., 1998) | Total sugars quartiles (g/1000 kcal) | Analysis of variance; coefficients of sums of squares for trend analysis | Children (g/1000 kcal): inverse P = 0.0001; negative linear trend P < 0.0001 & negative quadratic trend P < 0.05 | |||
| (Baghurst et al., 1992) | Added sugars deciles (% total energy) | Chi-squared test | Men & Women: NS | Men & Women: negative linear trend P< 0.001 | Men & Women: negative linear trend P < 0.001 | |
| (Erkkola et al., 2009) | Added sucrose quartiles (% energy) | One-way ANOVA | Children (saturated + trans): NS | Children: inverse P < 0.001 | Children: inverse P < 0.001 | |
| (Gibson, 1996) | NMES quintiles (% food energy) | Pearson Correlation Coefficient | Men & women: inverse P < 0.001 Trans fatty acids men: NS; women: inverse P < 0.01 | Men & women: inverse P < 0.001 | Men & women: inverse P < 0.001 | |
| (Gibson, 1996) | NMES quintiles (% food energy) | Pearson correlation coefficient | Most reliable records Men: inverse P < 0.01; Women: inverse P < 0.001 Trans fatty acids men: NS; women: inverse P < 0.05 | Most reliable records Men & women: inverse P < 0.001 | Most reliable records Men & women: inverse P < 0.001 | |
| (Gibson, 1996) | NMES quintiles (% food energy) | Multiple range test | Men & women: inverse P < 0.05 Trans fatty acids–Men & women: NS | Men & women: inverse P < 0.05 | Men & women: inverse P < 0.05 | |
| (Linseisen et al., 1998) | Sucrose percentiles (g/day) energy adjusted) | Multiple regression analysis model: unpaired t-test | g/day (energy adjusted) Children & adults: inverse P< 0.001 | g/day (energy adjusted) Children & adults: inverse P < 0.001 | g/day (energy adjusted) Children & adults: inverse P < 0.001 | |
| (Ruottinen et al., 2008) | Sucrose low/medium/high (% energy) | ANOVA, F-test | Children: positive P = 0.009 | Children: inverse P = 0.03 | Children: inverse P = 0.0001 | |
| Gibney et al., 1995) | Total sugars minus lactose 3 groupings (g/1000 kcal of total energy) | One-way analysis of variance and series of Student– Newman–Keuls range tests | g/1000 kcal (of total energy) Children & adults: inverse P ≤ 0.05 | |||
| Association with fatty acid (g/day) for population group |
||||||
| Saturated |
Monounsaturated |
Polyunsaturated |
||||
| (Baghurst et al., 1992) | Added sugars deciles (% total energy) | Chi-squared test | Men & Women: positive linear trend P < 0.001 | Men & Women: positive linear trend P < 0.05 | Men: negative linear trend P < 0.01; Women: NS | |
| Association with sugar/s intake for population group |
||||||
| Saturated fat categorization | Method of statistical | Total sugars | NMES | Total sugars | ||
| (% energy) |
analysis |
(% energy) |
(% energy) |
(g/day) |
NMES (g/day) |
|
| (Flynn et al., 1994) | Quartiles (% total energy) | No statistical analysis | Women: inverse | Women: inverse | Women: inverse | Women: inverse |
| (Matthys et al., 2006) | Tertiles (% energy) | Mann–Whitney U-test | Adolescents: inverse P = 0.000 | |||
| (Ruxton et al., 1996) | Correlation coefficient: total sugars (% energy) vs. saturated fat (% energy) | Pearson's correlation coefficient | Children: inverse r = −0.24 P < 0.01 | |||
Where indicated; NMES: nonmilk extrinsic sugars.