. 1991 Fall;13(1):93–109.

Table 2. Selected characteristics of the basic and urban-profit samples, by State: 1985.

	Case-mix systems			Facility-specific systems		Class-rate systems
	Maryland	Ohio	West Virginia	Facility-specific systems		Class-rate systems
Characteristic	Maryland	Ohio	West Virginia	Colorado	Florida	Texas	Utah
Basic sample
Number of facilities	15	23	13	23	20	22	19
Number of sample patients:
All payers	380	600	332	630	520	576	470
Medicaid	245	388	224	439	319	315	390
Ownership:
Percent profit	87	87	85	83	80	73	95
Number of profit	13	20	11	19	16	16	18
Number of non-profit	2	3	2	4	4	6	1
Location:
Percent urban	80	74	62	74	75	68	84
Number of urban	12	17	8	17	15	15	16
Number of rural	3	6	5	6	5	7	3
Average percent Medicaid¹	64	65	65	67	61	66	64
Average bed size (number of beds)	123	101	89	119	122	104	89
Average percent occupancy rate	98	92	97	91	93	83	86
Urban-profit sample²
Number of facilities	12	16	7	15	13	13	15
Number of sample patients:
All payers	306	411	181	421	340	348	369
Medicaid	190	282	140	295	194	246	256
Average percent Medicaid¹	62	68	71	82	57	67	67
Average bed size (number of beds)	128	99	99	135	131	115	87
Average percent occupancy rate	98	93	97	92	93	85	87

Percent Medicaid patient days in each facility, based on cost report data, averaged across the facility sample in each State.

The urban-profit sample is a subsample of the basic sample.