Skip to main content
. 1995 Summer;16(4):55–83.

Table 1. Before/After Changes in Hospitalization Rates, Hospital Days, and Community Discharge Rates for TNH and CNH Patients1.

TNH Patients CNH Patients Before/After Change



TNH Change CNH Change Mean Difference Significance3 Case-Mix Adjusted4
Before Mean After Mean Significance2 Before Mean After Mean Significance2
Difference Significance
Hospitalization Rates
(Admission Sample Patients)
Percent Hospitalized in: Percent Percent
 3 Months 19.3 12.3 .015 13.2 18.1 .130 -7.0 4.9 -11.9 .007 -17.2 .005
 6 Months 20.6 14.1 .010 21.5 21.9 .943 -6.5 0.4 -6.9 .109 -9.9 .073
 12 Months 25.3 16.0 .003 28.0 25.1 .408 -9.3 -2.9 -6.4 .128 -10.9 .061
Live Discharges
Percent Discharged to Hospital 41.5 27.0 <.001 42.2 42.8 .765 -14.5 0.6 -15.1 .016 -12.5 .055
Hospital Days
(Admission Sample Patients)
Hospitals Days in: Days Days
 3 Months 2.3 0.7 .009 0.7 1.2 .053 -1.6 0.5 -2.1 <.001 -2.3 <.001
 6 Months 3.0 1.0 .006 1.5 1.7 .098 -2.0 0.3 -2.3 .001 -2.2 .002
 12 Months 3.4 1.3 .003 2.5 2.3 .609 -2.1 -0.2 -1.9 .030 -2.2 .013
Community Discharge Rates
(Admission Sample Patients)
Percent Discharged to Community in: Percent Percent
 3 Months 34.0 45.7 .001 25.2 29.2 .246 11.7 4.7 7.0 .355 0.7 .882
 6 Months 38.5 48.1 .002 26.0 34.1 .047 9.6 8.1 1.5 .982 -7.6 .229
 12 Months 39.4 48.3 .003 28.8 35.3 .078 8.9 6.5 2.4 .820 -4.7 .461
1

Retrospective and prospective admission sample sizes are presented in the article. The results for live discharges are based on an overall sample size of 2,437 discharges.

2

Exact significance level for comparisons of hospitalization rates and community discharge rates are based on Fisher's exact test or the chi-square test approximation to Fisher's test. For comparisons of hospital days, significance levels are based on t-tests or Wilcoxon tests, depending on the underlying probability distribution.

3

For hospitalization rate and community discharge rate comparisons, the exact significance level for unadjusted mean differences based on significance of the coefficient of an interaction dichotomy (TNH × intervention [post] period) in a logistic regression model that also included dichotomies for pre/post and TNH/CNH. For comparisons involving hospital days, an ordinary least squares regression model was used.

4

Significance of the adjusted mean difference is the significance of the coefficient of the (TNH × post) interaction in a logistic (ordinary, for hospital days) regression model with case-mix covariates/risk factors and the pre/post and TNH/CNH dichotomies present. The adjusted mean difference was estimated from this logistic (ordinary, for hospital days) regression model.

NOTES: “Before” includes 1981-82. “After” includes 1985-87. TNH is teaching nursing home. CNH is comparison nursing home.

SOURCE: Primary data collected by nursing home and research staff on Teaching Nursing Home Program study patients (from TNHs and CNHs).