Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Oct 10.
Published in final edited form as: J Mix Methods Res. 2013 Jun 5;8(1):83–106. doi: 10.1177/1558689813490835

Table 3.

SEM Estimated Path Coefficients to Providers’ Intentions to Partner (N = 141).

Unbalanced partnership
Balanced partnership
β p Value β p Value
Demographics
 Male versus female −0.09 0.71 0.52* 0.05
 Age 0.00 0.97 0.03 0.79
 Education (1–4) −0.23* 0.02 −0.00 0.96
 Race/ethnicity
  African American versus White −0.15 0.61 0.38 0.28
  Latino(a) versus White 0.00 0.99 −0.22 0.57
  “Other” versus White −0.06 0.87 0.05 0.91
 Staff categories
  Supervising versus counseling 0.13 0.67 −0.01 0.98
  Educating versus counseling 0.15 0.59 0.25 0.45
  Coordinating versus counseling 0.51 0.13 0.29 0.49
Agency size and capacity
 Budget large versus small 0.15 0.65 −0.08 0.82
 Employees medium versus small −0.26 0.51 1.03* 0.02
 Employees large versus small −0.28 0.40 0.47 0.21
 Research experience (years) −0.06 0.75 −0.47* 0.00
 Number of research projects 0.11 0.33 0.05 0.70
Provider factors
 Research opinions 0.02 0.85 0.30* 0.04
 Expectation researcher 0.15 0.08 0.04 0.69
 Knowledge/skills −0.20* 0.05 0.22* 0.02
R2 .19 .48

Note. SEM = structural equation modeling.

*

p <.05.