Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Oct 10.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Cancer Res. 2011 Sep 20;17(22):7093–7104. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-0578

Table 1.

IC90 of 4-HPR, ABT-737 and CIN values of ABT-737 at concentrations in combination with 4-HPR

Group Cell line Phase of therapy IC90 (μM)
CIN at each concentration (μM)
4-HPR ABT-737 1.25 2.5 5 10
A. Prior to any therapy CHLA-15 DX 3.7 0.5 0.486 0.349 0.416 0.001
SMS-KAN DX 2.4 1.4 0.152 0.086 0.073 0.063

B. At progressive disease during or after therapy SMS-KCNR PD 2.3 1 0.342 0.414 0.321 0.382
SK-N-RA PD 12.3 >20 0.255 0.402 0.474 0.324
CHLA-20 PD 10.3 >20 1.458 0.648 0.56 0.161
LA-N-6 PD 3.2 13.7 - 0.794 1.016 0.425
SK-N-BE(2) PD 2.2 12.3 0.827 0.543 0.16 0.058
CHLA-119 PD* 1.1 15.8 0.619 0.353 0.496 0.109
CHLA-140 PD* 2.2 0.4 0.521 0.922 0.785 0.86

C. At relapse after myeloablative therapy and bone marrow transplantation CHLA-79 PD-BMT 8.6 >20 - 1.481 0.817 0.332
CHLA-136 PD-BMT 11.3 2.9 0.237 0.218 0.209 0.238

Lines in the panel included those established at diagnosis before therapy (DX), at time of progressive disease during or after non-myeloablative therapy (PD), after therapy with 13-cis-RA (PD*), after myeloablative therapy and bone marrow transplantation (PD-BMT).

A CIN less than 0.9 indicates synergism; 0.1, very strong synergism; 0.1 to 0.3, strong synergism; 0.3 to 0.7, good synergism; 0.7 to 0.85, moderate synergism; 0.85 to 0.9, slight synergism; 0.9 to 1.1, addictive; and more than 1.1, antagonism. - Indicates not applicable.