Skip to main content
. 2014 Oct 2;15:161. doi: 10.1186/1471-2369-15-161

Table 4.

Five-year cumulative budget impact results for the entire cohort (reference scenario versus scenarios 1–5)

Difference
Reference scenario (£) Scenario 1 (£) Scenario 2 (£) Scenario 3 (£) Scenario 4 (£) Scenario 5 (£)
Access costs 67,573,647 64,236 (0.10%) 64,236 (0.10%) -772,145 (-1.14%) -1,533,465 (-2.27%) 2,162,385 (3.20%)
Treatment costs 2,818,006,173 15,825,109 (0.56%) 55,320,485 (1.96%) 34,513,656 (1.22%) 15,651,634 (0.56%) 56,467,306 (2.00%)
ESA costs 173,328,756 755,080 (0.44%) 755,080 (0.44%) -3,477,002 (-2.01%) -7,316,930 (-4.22%) 10,903,915 (6.29%)
Monitoring costs 49,553,898 191,026 (0.39%) 191,026 (0.39%) 303,374 (0.61%) 405,098 (0.82%) -288,277 (-0.58%)
Complication costs 147,756,210 582,276 (0.39%) 582,276 (0.39%) 312,811 (0.21%) 48,730 (0.03%) 1,490,818 (1.01%)
Transportation costs 620,677,229 -36,982,815 (-5.96%) -36,982,815 (-5.96%) -70,900,727 (-11.42%) -101,706,432 (-16.39%) 101,841,215 (16.41%)
Total costs 3,876,895,913 -19,565,088 (-0.50%) 19,930,289 (0.51%) -40,020,032 (-1.03%) -94,451,365 (-2.44%) 172,577,361 (4.45%)

Abbreviations: ESA Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents.