Skip to main content
. 2004 Apr 28;32(8):2386–2395. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh562

Table 2. Genome properties for predicted prophage and monocin regions in the genomes of five Listeria.

Name Type 5′ end 3′ end Size (bp) % GC ORFs Span Target att site
L.monocytogenes F2365 φF2365.1
Monocin
132 412
143 134
10 723
37.31
17
LMOf2365_0131–LMOf2365_0147
None
None
L.monocytogenes H7858 φH7858.1
Monocin
159 262
169 984
10 723
37.30
17
LMOh7858_0138–LMOh7858_0154
None
None
L.monocytogenes H7858 φH7858.2
Prophage
2 387 007
2 346 385
40 623
35.46
66
LMOh7858_2410–LMOh7858_2475
comK
ggacg
L.monocytogenes F6854 φF6854.1
Monocin
142 468
153 188
107 21
37.20
17
LMOf6854_0126–LMOf6854_0142
None
None
L.monocytogenes F6854 φF6854.2
Prophage
2 384 184
2 342 944
41 241
36.10
48
LMOf6854_2344–LMOf6854_2391
comK
gga
L.monocytogenes F6854 φF6854.3
Prophage
2 697 390
2 658 558
38 833
35.68
52
LMOf6854_2652–LMOf6854_2703
tRNA-Thr-4
ttaagccacttgtcggatttgaaccgacgacc ccttccttaccatggaag
L.monocytogenes EGD-e φEGDe.1
Monocin
120 657
131 377
10 721
37.28
17 (18)
lmo0113–lmo0129
None
None
L.monocytogenes EGD-e φEGDe.2
Prophage
2 402 413
2 360 621
41 793
36.11
62 (68)
lmo2271–lmo2332
comK
gga
L.innocua 11262 φ11262.1
Prophage
76 060
115 548
39 489
37.28
58 (63)
lin0071–lin0129
tRNA-Lys-4
actcttaatcagcgggtcgggggttcgaaaccctcacaacccatatat
L.innocua 11262 φ11262.2
Monocin
155 934
166 658
10 725
36.26
17
lin0160–lin0176
None
None
L.innocua 11262 φ11262.3
Prophage
1 246 499
1 297 065
50 567
34.61
71 (81)
lin1231–lin1302
Similar to lmo1263
aagtacacatca
L.innocua 11262 φ11262.4
Prophage
1 762 142
1 713 123
49 020
36.06
69 (81)
lin1697–lin1765
Intergenic
tatcccacaaaa[a/aa]tcccacaa
L innocua 11262 φ11262.5
Prophage
2 445 938
2 406 614
39 325
35.86
54 (64)
lin2372–lin2426
comK
gga
L.innocua 11262 φ11262.6 Prophage 2 625 922 2 587 434 38 489 35.13 50 (63) lin2561–lin2610 tRNA-Arg-4 atgccctcggaggga

Note that the coordinates and predicted sizes of each region include sequences for putative core att sites. The number of ORFs was derived from the GenBank accessions for the two published genomes (8), but the number in parentheses reflects the number of predicted ORFs derived from a TIGR automated ORF prediction and annotation.