Skip to main content
. 2014 Sep 24;136(40):14019–14022. doi: 10.1021/ja508757g

Table 2. Effect of Substituents and Ring Size on Selectivitya.

graphic file with name ja-2014-08757g_0006.jpg

      reversal of regioselectivity: regioisomer ratio (11:12)b
erb
entry substrate conv. (%)c m-CPBAd (15a, total) 15a, matchede 10 11 12
1 10a 41 7.9:1 (1:3.7) 1:12 73:27 70:30 96:4
2 10b 45 2.5:1 (1:4.5) 1:28 76:24 85:15 97:3
3 10c 64 1.4:1 (1:1.8) 1:24 71:29 93:7 92:8
4 10d 20f 3.0:1 (1:3.1) 1:8.2 NDg 64:36 95:5
5 10e 20 6.1:1h (1:1.8) 1:4.4 56:44 64:36 91:9
6 10f 44 5.2:1 (1:7.3) 1:23 80:20 71:29 93:7
7i 10g 51 1:2.3 (1:38) <1:100 85:15 78:22 85:15
8 10h 52f >100:1 (5.2:1) 2.3:1 54:46 56:44 99:1
9 10i 44f 3.3:1 (1.2:1) 1:4.3 53:47 83:17 88:12
a

Conditions: 15a (10 mol %), 4-dimethylaminopyridine (DMAP, 10 mol %), N,N′-diisopropylcarbodiimide (DIC, 3.0 equiv), H2O2 (3.8 equiv), CHCl3 (0.1 M), 21 °C, 24 h.

b

Determined by HPLC.

c

See Table 1, footnote b.

d

m-CPBA (1.1 equiv), CHCl3 (0.1 M), 21 °C, 12 h.

e

Product ratio for the enantiomer that reacts more rapidly with the catalyst.

f

Conversion approximated from comparison of HPLC peak integrations of the products to the substrate.

g

ND = not determined.

h

m-CPBA (2.0 equiv) used.

i

DIC (1.5 equiv), H2O2 (1.9 equiv) used.