Skip to main content
. 2014 Oct 1;23(10):806–816. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2014.4754

Table 3.

Average Reported Frequencies of Communication with Relatives About a Family History of Cancer

  Baselinea(n=489) 1 month(n=374) 6 months(n=299) 14 months(n=282) Difference (95% CI)b p-Valueb
All subjects         0.14 (0.05, 0.23) <0.001
 Control 1.45 (0.47) 1.41 (0.50) 1.54 (0.62) 1.57 (0.56)    
 Intervention 1.50 (0.58) 1.55 (0.60) 1.75 (0.70) 1.78 (0.71)    
Not pregnantc         0.15 (0.03, 0.27) 0.018
 Control 1.38 (0.42) 1.37 (0.40) 1.50 (0.59) 1.47 (0.47)    
 Intervention 1.46 (0.60) 1.52 (0.52) 1.71 (0.63) 1.63 (0.64)    
Pregnantc         −0.03 (−0.17, 0.11) 0.699
 Control 1.34 (0.37) 1.35 (0.45) 1.45 (0.42) 1.56 (0.57)    
 Intervention 1.37 (0.43) 1.35 (0.45) 1.39 (0.37) 1.52 (0.48)    
a

Frequency of communication [mean (SD)] with all listed first- and second-degree relatives on a four-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 4 (a lot).

b

p-Value and confidence interval comparing intervention and control groups using mixed model analysis controlling for baseline value of outcome measure. Only the OR and 95% CI for the analysis summarizing over all time periods is presented.

c

Significant effect moderation: pregnancy (age ≤40 years), p=0.064, coefficient and 95% CI of interaction term, −0.18 (−0.36, −0.01).