Table 2.

Pearson correlation between the true and predicted genomic breeding values for group bridge, MCP, lasso and SCAD for trait T2 based on systematic groups.

Group size	Penalty selected by AIC					Penalty selected by BIC
	Bridge	MCP	Lasso	SCAD	SGLasso	Bridge	MCP	Lasso	SCAD
1	0.756	0.790	0.826	0.810	0.841	0.828	0.837	0.827	0.795
10	0.779	0.809	0.852	0.840	0.845	0.819	0.839	0.813	0.776
20	0.762	0.809	0.844	0.833	0.845	0.818	0.838	0.779	0.780
30	0.758	0.809	0.836	0.827	0.845	0.801	0.838	0.765	0.744
40	0.710	0.810	0.818	0.788	0.845	0.790	0.838	0.735	0.688
50	0.714	0.809	0.827	0.808	0.846	0.807	0.837	0.746	0.697
60	0.708	0.808	0.810	0.804	0.843	0.810	0.837	0.738	0.708
70	0.700	0.809	0.806	0.804	0.843	0.789	0.837	0.731	0.680
80	0.702	0.809	0.811	0.800	0.844	0.790	0.837	0.735	0.641
90	0.669	0.808	0.795	0.793	0.848	0.785	0.837	0.714	0.607
100	0.704	0.808	0.803	0.792	0.841	0.798	0.837	0.808	0.632

Although listed under AIC, SGLasso used only 10-fold cross validation. The Pearson correlation for ridge regression for comparison is 0.772.