Skip to main content
. 2012 Aug 2;4(2):189–200. doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2012.06.002

Table 4.

Distribution of cases in relation to E/A ratio (diastolic grade) before and after intervention in both groups.

E/A ratio type Control group (15) Training group (15)
No. % No. %
Before intervention
Normal 0 0 0 0
Grade I diastolic dysfunction 7 46.6 11 73.4
Grade II diastolic dysfunction 4 22.7 2 13.3
Grade III diastolic dysfunction 4 22.7 2 13.3
p Value X2 = 2.22, p = 0.3291a



After intervention
Normal 0 0 8 53.3
Grade I diastolic dysfunction 8 53.3 5 33.3
Grade II diastolic dysfunction 3 20 1 6.7
Grade III diastolic dysfunction 4 22.7 1 6.7
p Value X2 = 11.49, p = 0.0093b
a

Nonsignificant.

b

Significant.