Skip to main content
. 2012 Aug 2;4(2):189–200. doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2012.06.002

Table 5.

Comparison between patients with grade I diastolic dysfunction in both groups as regards to diastolic parameters before and after training.

Variables E/A ratio (grade I)
p Value #
Control group (7) Training group (11)
E-wave(cm/s) before intervention
Median 49 42.2 0.8914 a
25%th quartile 40 38.6
75%th quartile 53.3 65.1



E-wave after
Median 36 62.2 0.0031 b
25%th quartile 35.6 43
75%th quartile 45 93.2



Percent of change in E wave
Median −12.62 43.16 0.0203 b
25%th quartile −33.2 38.26
75%th quartile 12.5 47.85



A-wave(cm/s) before intervention
Median 73 83.7 0.2956 a
25%th quartile 65.3 80
75%th quartile 101 96.4



A-wave after
Median 73 56 0.0018 b
25%th quartile 70 51.5
75%th quartile 81 70



Percent of change in A wave
Median −0.46 −27.39 0.0159 b
25%th quartile −26.73 −38.47
75%th quartile 0.282 −26.49



E/A ratio before intervention
Median 0.564 0.528 0.6823 a
25%th quartile 0.528 0.447
75%th quartile 0.685 0.778



E/A ratio after
Median 0.493 0.982 0.0017 b
25%th quartile 0.481 0.635
75%th quartile 0.634 1.81



Percent of change in E/A ratio
Median −8.84 107.69 0.0004 b
25%th quartile −12.5 40.97
75%th quartile 10.58 132.67

Wicoxon rank test

# Mann–Whitney test.