Skip to main content
. 2014 Aug 9;26(5):561–570. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzu071

Table 2.

Characteristics of 27 systematic reviews of integrated care

Characteristic
Year of publication 2005 (1997–2012)
Total no. of studies included (range per review) 824 (4–112)
 RCTsa 480 (1–93)
 Studies with concurrent control groupsa 90 (1–27)
 Before–after studiesa 41 (2–8)
 Ecological studiesa 1 (0–1)
 Other observational studiesa 25 (1–6)
Review included meta-analysis 18 (67%)
Methodological quality
 Median no. of AMSTAR items met (range) 5 (0–10)
Disease areas
 CHF 12 (44%)
 DM 7 (26%)
 COPD 7 (26%)
 Asthma 5 (19%)
 Hypertension 3 (11%)
 Cancer 2 (7%)
 Rheumatoid arthritis 2 (7%)
 Otherb 5 (19%)
Principles of integration assessed
 Comprehensive services across the care continuum 26 (96%)
 Standardized care through inter-professional teams 25 (93%)
 Patient focus 22 (81%)
 Performance management 17 (63%)
 Physician integration 15 (56%)
 Information systems 13 (48%)
 Organizational culture and leadership 5 (19%)
 Geographic coverage and rostering 1 (4%)
 Governance structure 1 (4%)
 Financial management 0 (0%)
Outcomes assessed
 Use of healthcare resources 20 (74%)
 Patient-centred 16 (59%)
 Functional 16 (59%)
 Costs 15 (56%)
 Process 11 (41%)
 Clinical 10 (37%)

AMSTAR, Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews instrument.

aTwenty-four reviews assessed the design of primary studies.

bStroke, orthopaedics, osteoarthritis, respiratory disease, angina, back pain and chronic pain, angina, hyperlipidaemia and coronary artery disease.