Skip to main content
. 2014 Aug 9;26(5):561–570. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzu071

Table 4.

Results of 27 systematic reviews of integrated care for different conditions and outcomes

No. of reviews with improved outcome/no. of reviews assessing outcomea
Outcome CHF (12 reviews) Diabetes (7 reviews) COPD (7 reviews) Asthma (5 reviews)
Clinical
 Improved glycaemic control 4/7
 Improved blood pressure control 1/4
 Reduced mortality 5/8 0/3
Functional
 Improved exercise capacity/functionb 2/2 2/3 2/4 1/3
Patient centred
 Improved quality of life 4/8 4/5 0/5 1/2
 Higher patient satisfaction 0/2 4/4 2/2 1/2
Process of care
 Improved adherence to treatment guidelinesc 2/5 4/6 3/3 5/5
 More regular retinal and foot examinations 3/7
Use of healthcare resources
 Reduced hospital admissions 4/6 2/3 2/5 2/3
 Reduced readmissions 5/9 2/3
 Reduced re-admissions or mortality 2/2
 Increased time between discharge and readmission 1/3
 Reduced length of hospital stay 4/8 1/1 4/4
 Reduced number of ED visits 2/3 1/3 2/3 1/2
 Increased use of appropriate medication 0/2
Costs
 Reduced costs of services 1/8 1/4 0/3 1/2

Only outcomes assessed by at least two reviews are shown.

LDL, low density lipoprotein; ED, emergency department; CHF, chronic heart failure; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

aNumber of reviews showing positive trends or significant (P < 0.05) improvements associated with integrated care models over the number of reviews that examined this outcome.

bExercise capacity, physical activity, functional status, lung function, forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1).

cAdherence to treatments or diets, provider adherence to guidelines including the screening for risk factors or conditions, improved patient self-care and knowledge as a result of improved adherence of providers to guidelines.