Skip to main content
. 2004 May 11;101(21):8028–8033. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0401069101

Table 1. Mean ± SEM implantation sites and corpora lutea.

Implantation sites
Corpora lutea
Phenotype n Injection day Control MO CaBP-D9k MO Control MO CaBP-d9k MO
WT 3 2.5 3.5 ± 0.2 2.5 ± 0.2 4.0 ± 0.1 4 ± 0.2
WT 4 3.5 3.5 ± 0.2 3.5 ± 0.1 4.5 ± 0.1 5.5 ± 0.3
CaBP-d28k 4 2.5 4.7 ± 0.1 0* 5.0 ± 0.1 5 ± 0.2
CaBP-d28k 3 3.5 3.3 ± 0.1 4.7 ± 0.2* 4.5 ± 0.2 4.7 ± 0.2

Numbers of implantation sites and corporal lutea (mean ± SEM) in WT and CaBP-d28k null mice on d5.5 when treated by intrauterine injection of either control MO or CaBP-d9k MO on d2.5 or d3.5 of pregnancy. *, P < 0.01 compared with control.