Skip to main content
. 2014 Oct 13;9(10):e110117. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110117

Table 5. Results from cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analyses based on 1000 bootstrap replications.

Analysis type Group (N) Probability of highest net monetary benefit (WTP = 0),% Probability of highest net monetary benefit (WTP = 18,000),% Probability of highest net monetary benefit (WTP = 80,000),%
Video Text Control Video Text Control Video Text Control Video Text Control
Primary analysis
Prolonged abstinence (PA) a 670 708 721 42 16 42 70 11 20 90 7 3
QALY (EQ-5D-3L) b 667 704 717 38 18 45 39 18 43 41 20 39
Sensitivity analysis
Seven-day point prevalence abstinence (PPA) c 670 708 721 38 17 46 46 22 31 48 34 18
PA without surgery costs 670 708 721 41 17 42 68 12 20 90 7 3
PA without respondent costs 670 708 721 43 20 38 68 14 17 90 7 3
PA without medication costs 670 708 721 36 23 42 61 19 21 87 10 4
QALY without surgery costs 667 704 717 43 15 41 44 16 41 44 17 39
QALY without respondents costs 667 704 717 41 18 41 43 18 39 45 18 37
QALY without medication costs 667 704 717 35 27 38 38 26 37 40 24 36
a

Coded as 2 =  prolonged abstinent and 1 =  not prolonged abstinent,

b

based on the Dutch algorithm for the EQ-5D-3L scores,

c

coded as 2 =  seven-day point prevalence abstinent and 1 =  not seven-day point prevalence abstinent;