Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Oct 14.
Published in final edited form as: Med Image Anal. 2013 Mar 7;17(4):417–428. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2013.02.005

Table 1.

Quantitative comparison of RMSE and PSNR (dB) in CBF maps at low-dose are reports using cTSVD, KSVD-SPD and our proposed method. The average value for the patients with CTP deficits, with normal CTP maps and all data are reported. The best performance of each column is highlighted.

Metric Method Fig. 2 Fig. 3 Deficit Normal All data
RMSE cTSVD 9.47 12.05 12.72±6.45 11.46±3.28 12.09±4.87
KSVD-SPD 7.99 9.32 10.05±4.33 8.65±1.98 9.35±3.26
Proposed 7.23 8.74 9.24±4.62 8.28±2.53 7.32±3.54

PSNR cTSVD 33.89 34.46 32.95±1.79 31.77±2.30 32.36±2.04
KSVD-SPD 34.67 36.70 34.71±1.42 34.03±2.31 34.37±1.85
Proposed 36.23 37.25 35.73±1.48 34.75±2.36 35.24±1.93