Table 1. Summary of threading results from prospector_3 and optimization by tasser.
| 〈rmsd to native〉, ŧ
|
Nfold¶
|
||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ntargets* | Template selected† | 〈covali〉, %‡ | Tali | Mali | Ment | Tali | Mali | Ment | |
| Easy set | 877 (59%) | Top-2 + consensus | 87 | 4.4 | 3.1 | 3.7 | 736 (84%) | 819 (93%) | 769 (88%) |
| Medium set | 605 (40.5%) | Top-5 (Z score > 7) | 62 | 9.7 | 6.3 | 8.0 | 191 (32%) | 348 (58%) | 216 (36%) |
| Hard set | 7 (0.5%) | Top-20 | 75 | 11.3 | 6.0 | 6.3 | 0 (0%) | 5 (71%) | 5 (71%) |
| Total | 1,489 (100%) | 77 | 6.7 | 4.4 | 5.5 | 927 (62%) | 1,172 (79%) | 990 (66%) | |
Number and percentage of the target proteins in each category
Number of templates used in the assembly procedure. For easy targets, we used the top-2 templates of highest Z score and an artificial template consisting of the consensus region of these two templates if identified; for medium targets, up to five hits with Z score > 7; for hard targets, up to 20 templates, all having weak scores
Alignment coverage on average for the best template that has the lowest rmsd to native
rmsd to native on average for the best initial templates and the best of top five models. Tali, template structures with rmsd calculated over aligned residues; Mali, model with rmsd calculated over the aligned residues; Ment, model with rmsd calculated over the entire chain
Number of targets with rmsd to native < 6.5 Å. The value in parentheses is the fraction of targets in the specific category set