Table 1. Probability of success for experiments like those in Dias and Ressler (2014).

Experiment	Type	Sample sizes	Reported inference	Probability of success
Figure 1a	Behavior	16, 13	μ1 ≠ μ2	0.512
Figure 1b	Behavior	7, 9	μ1 = μ2	0.908
Figure 1c	Behavior	11, 13, 19	ANOVA, μ1 ≠ μ2, μ2 ≠ μ3, μ1 ≥ μ3	0.662
Figure 1d	Behavior	10, 11, 8	ANOVA, μ1 = μ2, μ2 ≠ μ3	0.712
Figure 2a	Behavior	16, 16	μ1 ≠ μ2	0.663
Figure 2b	Behavior	16, 16	μ1 ≠ μ2	0.928
Figure 3g	Neuroanatomy	38, 38, 18	ANOVA, μ1 ≠ μ2, μ2 ≠ μ3	0.782
Figure 3h	Neuroanatomy	31, 40, 16	ANOVA, μ1 ≠ μ2, μ2 ≠ μ3	≈1.00
Figure 3i	Neuroanatomy	6, 6, 4	ANOVA, μ1 ≠ μ2, μ2 ≠ μ3	0.998
Figure 4a	Behavior	8, 12	μ1 ≠ μ2	0.675
Figure 4b	Behavior	8, 11	μ1 ≠ μ2	0.545
Figure 4g	Neuroanatomy	7, 8	μ1 ≠ μ2	0.999
Figure 4h	Neuroanatomy	6, 10	μ1 ≠ μ2	0.974
Figure 4i	Neuroanatomy	23, 16	μ1 ≠ μ2	0.973
Figure 4j	Neuroanatomy	16, 19	μ1 ≠ μ2	≈1.00
Figure 5a	Behavior	13, 16	μ1 ≠ μ2	0.600
Figure 5b	Behavior	4, 7, 6, 5	ANOVA, μ1 ≠ μ2, μ3 ≠ μ4	0.775
Figure 5g	Neuroanatomy	6, 4, 5, 3	ANOVA, μ1 ≠ μ2, μ3 ≠ μ4, μ1 = μ3	0.892
Figure 5h	Neuroanatomy	4, 3, 8, 4	ANOVA, μ3 ≠ μ4, μ1 = μ3	0.824
Figure 6a	Neuroanatomy	12, 10	μ1 ≠ μ2	0.574
Figure 6c	Neuroanatomy	12, 10	μ1 = μ2	0.901
Figure 6e	Neuroanatomy	8, 8	μ1 ≠ μ2	0.681

The reported inferences were those used by Dias and Ressler (2014) to support their theoretical claims. The probability of success for such inferences is estimated by post hoc power calculations or simulated experiments. Experiments are labeled according to the data figures in Dias and Ressler 2014.