Skip to main content
. 2014 Apr 24;31(10):2618–2629. doi: 10.1007/s11095-014-1359-6

Table I.

Formulations Tested in an Excipient Screening Experiment (S). DU Recoveries were Determined Directly After Lyophilization

Sugars Polyols Amino acids Proteins Other DU recovery (%)
T1 T2 T3
S0 12 17 2
S1a

7% sorbitol

7% mannitol

2% MSG

2% glycine

7% ovalbumin 66 89 73
S2a

7% sorbitol

7% mannitol

2% MSG

2% glycine

7% ovalbumin 10 mM EDTA 66 81 77
S3a

7% sorbitol

7% mannitol

2% MSG

2% glycine

73 95 74
S4

3% sucrose

3% dextran

3% myo-inositol

3% ovalbumin 27 58 12
S5 5% sucrose

5% sorbitol

5% mannitol

2% glycine

3% lysine

3% arginine

15 49 5
S6a 5% sucrose

5% sorbitol

5% mannitol

3% MSG

2% glycine

3% lysine

65 86 76
S7

5% sucrose

5% trehalose

3% lysine

3% alanine

34 67 36
S8

5% sucrose

5% trehalose

3% lysine

3% alanine

0.01% Tween80 38 82 43
S9 5% sucrose

3% lysine

3% alanine

3% Ca-lactobionate 36 36 24
S10 5% sucrose

3% lysine

3% alanine

3% rec. gelatin 45 72 46
S11a 5% sorbitol 5% peptone 2% MgCl2 80 79 75
S12a 5% sorbitol 5% peptone 1% LiCl 86 100 87
S13

5% sucrose

5% trehalose

5% peptone 29 62 26

aFormulation selected for stability testing (as shown in Fig. 3)