Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Apr 14.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Commun. 2014 Oct 14;5:4729. doi: 10.1038/ncomms5729

Figure 2. Performance of irreversible recombinase switches.

Figure 2

a | Schematics of the four tested recombinase switches based on site-specific recombinase Cre, FlpO and PhiC31. The switch constructs undergo site-specific recombination in order to express constitutively-driven reporter gene through various strategies (see also Supplementary Fig.1). Triangles indicate recombinase recognition sites. b | Maximal switch response (yellow bars) and corresponding efficiency (blue bars) of each switch. The efficiency is calculated as the ratio between recombinase-triggered reporter expression level and the expression level of pre-recombined control reporter in the presence of the same recombinase amount. Each bar represents mean±SD from three biological replicates measured 48 hours after transfection by flow cytometry (see also Supplementary Fig. 1). Plasmid amounts are provided in Supplementary Table 1. c | Schematics of the experimental setup for testing regulated recombinase activity. A CMV-driven transactivator is co-transfected with a recombinase driven by an appropriate inducible promoter and a recombinase-triggered switch. d | Top: activator-promoter combinations. Bottom: bar charts comparing the basal switch response ("−", no activator) and the maximal response observed with different transactivators ("+") (see also Supplementary Fig. 2). Each bar represents mean±SD of three biological replicates measured 48 hours after transfection by flow cytometry. Plasmid amounts are provided in Supplementary Table 2 and quantitative readouts of key samples in Supplementary Table 3.