Skip to main content
. 2014 Oct 15;4:6625. doi: 10.1038/srep06625

Table 3. Univariate and multivariate analysis of prognostic factors in HCC for overall survival.

  Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
  HR p > |z| 95% CI HR p > |z| 95% CI
MAGE-A9 expression            
High versus Low 3.22 0.001* 1.804–5.737 2.17 0.022* 1.121–4.205
Gender            
Male versus Female 1.13 0.740 0.554–2.297      
Age (years)            
<60 versus ≥60 1.72 0.121 0.867–3.396      
Tumour size (cm)            
>5 versus ≤5 1.84 0.031* 1.058–3.183 1.44 0.244 0.778–2.679
α-fetoprotein status            
High versus Low 1.03 0.896 0.618–1.734      
Hepatitis B virus infection            
Positive versus Negative 1.19 0.539 0.682–2.078      
Liver cirrhosis            
Positive versus Negative 0.84 0.519 0.494–1.428      
Pathological grade            
Grade 1 and 2 versus Grade 3 0.44 0.005* 0.245–0.783 0.79 0.455 0.425–1.467
Portal vein invasion            
Positive versus Negative 3.33 0.001* 1.966–5.645 1.95 0.039* 1.035–3.656
Lymph node metastasis            
Positive versus Negative 2.42 0.001* 1.408–4.159 1.74 0.066 0.964–3.133
Distant metastasis            
Positive versus Negative 2.10 0.088 0.896–4.917      
TNM stage            
Stage I-II versus Stage III-IV 0.35 0.001* 0.200–0.612 0.86 0.690 0.411–1.800
MAGE-A9 expression + α-fetoprotein status            
Both high versus Others situations (High + Low or Low + High or Both low) 1.59 0.100 0.915–2.748      

*p < 0.05.