Table 1.
Techniques available | Enzyme/genetic requirements | Purposes | Advantages | Inconveniences | Key technologies |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
In vitro activity-based metabolomic profiling | Purified, homogeneous enzyme | Track enzyme-induced changes in a complex metabolite extract | High throughput (hundreds to thousands of metabolites can be screened). | Enzymes have to be purified to homogeneity. | Protein purification |
Physiologically relevant library of substrates and co-factors. | Host organism or related species has to be cultured. | LC/GC/CE-MS | |||
No a priori knowledge of the types and number of substrates and products involved. | Recombinant expression might lead to loss of native partner or post-translational modifications required for activity. | NMR | |||
No a priori knowledge of the type of chemistry catalysed. | Substrates might not be present at quantifiable levels in molecular extract. | Libraries of spectral data | |||
Direct identification of potential substrates and products. | |||||
Ex vivo metabolomic profiling – genetically modified/chemically treated organism | None or verified genetic knockout/over-expression strain of organism of interest | Identify one enzymatic reaction or pathway that is disturbed upon deletion/alteration of levels of a particular enzyme | High throughput (hundreds to thousands of metabolites can be screened). | Host organism or related species has to be cultured and genetically tractable. | Genetic manipulation LC/GC/CE-MS |
No knowledge of the types and number of substrates and products involved required. | Candidate substrates and products might constitute secondary effect changes. | NMR | |||
No knowledge of the type of chemistry catalysed required. | Levels of substrates/products might be tightly controlled and not change. | Libraries of spectral data | |||
No enzyme purification required | Chemical with a clear phenotype must be available. | ||||
Preservation of native enzyme partners and post-translational modifications. | |||||
Activity-based protein profiling | None | Track activity of a specific class of enzymes towards a probe | High throughput (several dozen enzymes can be screened). | Highly selective and specific probe needs to be synthesized. | Chemical probe |
Identifies active enzymes. | Identification of physiological substrates needs to be carried out subsequently. | Gel electrophoresis | |||
Highly specific for the chemistry and enzyme class to which the probe has been developed. | Host organism or related species has to be cultured. | Imaging | |||
No enzyme purification or genetic modification required | Active enzyme of interest needs to be identified. | Protein identification | |||
Preservation of native enzyme partners and post-translational modifications. | |||||
Computational enzymology | High-resolution structure | Identification of putative substrates, products and intermediates based on structural determinants | High throughput in silico approach can be applied to any enzyme type. | Relies on strength of ligand docking software and accuracy of crystal structure. | Docking |
No a priori knowledge of substrate specificity or type of chemistry catalysed required. | Identified compounds might not exist in the host organism. | Virtual libraries | |||
Computation | |||||
X-ray crystallography | Purified, homogeneous enzyme | Identify co-purified small molecules associated with purified enzyme | Tightly bound ligands can directly lead to the identity of substrates/products/intermediates. | Enzymes have to co-purify with a tightly bound metabolite. | Protein purification |
High-resolution structure | Enzymes have to be crystallized and the structure has to be solved at sufficiently high resolution. | Crystallization | |||
Bound ligand structure has to be determined. | Structure determination | ||||
Bound ligand might not be present in the host organism or be related to the native function. |
NMR, nuclear magnetic resonance; GC/LC/CE, gas or liquid chromatography or capillary electrophoresis.