Skip to main content
. 2014 Sep-Oct;21(5):283–286. doi: 10.1155/2014/595320

TABLE 2.

Reviewers’ satisfaction with the review process (percent of respondents)

Item Grants Manuscripts
Overall impression of process, good or excellent 95 94
‘Good fit’ between your expertise and documents you reviewed, agree or strongly agree 100 78
Ample time to review, yes 70 88
Agree with ‘open’ review process, yes 90 88
Prefer structured or unstructured format for review, structured 76 44
Would you like to see your co-reviewer’s review, yes 71 75
Would you like feedback about the quality of your review from the CCCTG, yes 62 56

Data presented as %. CCCTG Canadian Critical Care Trials Group