Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Orthop Trauma. 2015 Jan;29(1):e12–e17. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000132

Table 1.

Comparison of fracture location by long bone segment (proximal, distal, diaphyseal) and sub-segment (epiphysis vs. metaphysis).

N (%) Obese
(WFA>95th)
Non-Obese P-value
Femur, N 68 198
  Long bone segment
    Proximal 3 (4.4) 12 (6.1) 0.8020
    Distal 9 (13.2) 22 (11.1)
    Diaphyseal 56 (82.4) 164 (82.8)
  Proximal and distal sub-segments
    Epiphysis 11 (91.7) 15 (44.1) 0.0043
    Metaphysis 1 (8.33) 19 (55.9)
  Proximal sub-segment
    Epiphysis 2 (66.7) 0 (-) 0.0286*
    Metaphysis 1 (33.3) 12 (100)
  Distal sub-segment
    Epiphysis 9 (100) 15 (68.2) 0.0766*
    Metaphysis 0 (-) 7 (31.8)
Tibia, N 23 105
  Long bone segment
    Proximal 1 (4.4) 12 (11.4) 0.5492
    Distal 10 (43.5) 38 (36.2)
    Diaphyseal 12 (52.2) 55 (52.4)
  Proximal-distal sub-segment
    Epiphysis 9 (81.8) 18 (36.0) 0.0077*
    Metaphysis 2 (18.2) 32 (64.0)
  Proximal sub-segment
    Epiphysis 1 (100) 1 (8.3) 0.1538
    Metaphysis 0 (-) 11 (91.7)
  Distal sub-segment
    Epiphysis 8 (80.0) 17 (44.7) .0753*
    Metaphysis 2 (20.0) 21 (55.3)
*

Fisher’s exact test