Figure 5.

A, Possible predictors of category evidence during recency judgments. The four predictors were hippocampal encoding (“enc”) and retrieval (“ret”) univariate activation (“act”), as well as ERS for the intervening items (“int”) and all nonsequence same-category items (“cat”). B, Hippocampal ERS for intervening items is related to category evidence. Parameter estimates from the regression of hippocampal responses on classifier output for the presented category. Hippocampal ERS was positively related to classifier output in the no switch condition. Error bars reflect SEM; *p < 0.05, one-tailed.