Skip to main content
. 2014 Oct 16;9(10):e110106. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110106

Table 3. Comparison of microstructural parameters among the three groups.

Male Female
TACE CH Control TACE CH Control
App BV/TV (%) 27.8±13.5 28.6±8.7 31.9±7.8 21.2±10.5** 27.8±10.8 29.8±9.6
App Tb.N (1/mm3) 0.34±0.08* 0.36±0.06 0.38±0.05 0.30±0.10* 0.35±0.06 0.36±0.07
App Tb.S (µm) 842±281* 775±147 710±109 1003±392** 811±171 770±195
SMI 1.76±0.53* 1.74±0.39 1.61±0.36 2.00±0.44** 1.75±0.48 1.69±0.40
Euler’s number −1426±1149** −1792±1105 −2185±977 −665±879** −1074±681 −1402±825
Degree of anisotropy 1.41±0.11 1.43±0.12 1.41±0.09 1.48±0.10 1.52±0.20 1.45±0.11

**P<0.01, *P<0.05, control vs. post TACE.

app BV/TV, apparent trabecular bone volume fraction; app Tb.N, apparent trabecular number; app Tb.S, apparent trabecular separation; SMI, structure model index.