Skip to main content
. 2014 Aug 5;4(10):1787–1795. doi: 10.1534/g3.114.013003

Table 3. Gene set 1 and set 2 results of DAVID analysis with the highest enrichment scores.

Gene Set Functional Annotation Cluster Descriptiona Enrichm. Scoreb Genesc
1 Immune response (49; 4.73)d; inflammatory response (31; 6-36); response to wounding (37; 4.65); defense response (39; 4.23) 15.29 65
2 Epidermis development (13, 8.53); epidermal cell differentiation (7; 11.74); epithelial cell differentiation (8; 7.05); keratinocyte differentiation (6, 10.98), epithelium development (9;0.4.79); cornified envelope (3; 16.60); keratinization (3; 8.43) 4.14 14
2 Cytoskeleton (27; 2.38) 3.23 27
2 Cell junction (16; 3.76); anchoring junction (9; 6.37); apical junction complex (6; 7.38); adherens junction (7; 5.50) 2.22 16
2 Desmosome (3; 18.26), tight junction (3; 5.84) 1.58 6
a

Based on the most prominent "terms."

b

Geometric mean (in −log10) of p-values of groups with corresponding "annotation clusters."

c

Total number of genes in one cluster.

d

In parentheses: number of genes and the "fold enrichment of the functional term."