Skip to main content
. 2014 Jul 31;4(10):1797–1811. doi: 10.1534/g3.114.012377

Table 5. Effects of markers associated with chip quality in the CHIPS-ALL population on reducing sugar content in the SUGAR40 panel after 0 (T0), 1 (T1), 2 (T2), 4 (T4), and 12 wk (T12) storage at 4° (log10 transformation, ANOVA).

Markera Minor Allele Frequency, % T0 Percent Variance Explainedb T1 Percent Variance Explainedb T2 Percent Variance Explainedb T4 Percent Variance Explainedb T12 Percent Variance Explainedb
PWD-G11140A 7.5 (A) ↑c ns 9.6** 11.3** 19.2*** 19.0***
BMY1-G2533A 29.4 (A) ↑ 6.1* 7.0* ns 5.2* ns
BMY1-G2657A 7.0 (A) ↑ 8.1** 5.4* 4.6* 4.7* ns
BMY1-G2751A 6.4 (A) ↓ 3.7* 5.3* 4.2* 3.7* 3.6*
StpL(PHO1b)-3e_G1305T1311d 13.1 (1) ↑ 18.0*** 19.5*** 16.9*** 13.3*** 15.6***
StpL(PHO1b)-3b_A158C159 A1250d 9.4 (1) ↓ 16.3*** 25.4*** 18.5*** 21.1*** 17.1***
PHO1b-A3931G 2.6 (G) ↓ 12.6*** 13.9*** 13.4*** 11.7*** 13.0***
PHO1b-A3982C 25.6 (C) ↑↓ 9.1* 9.8** 9.3* 10.3** 7.9*
PHO1b-C3990T 7.0 (T) ↑ 6.2* 6.5* 11.2** 5.7* ns
PHO1b-G4181A 16.7 (A) ↑↓ 15.1*** 14.2*** 12.4** 11.6** 8.7**
PHO1b-G4106A 30.1 (A) ↑ 18.9*** 23.0*** 25.7*** 32.0*** 25.9***
PHO1b-A4207G 16.0 (G) ↑ 11.3* 14.6** 13.5** ns 10.0*
PHO1b-T4404C 8.1 (C) ↑ 8.9** 14.1*** 16.3*** 15.6*** 8.8**
Stp23-8b_PHO1a-HAd 6.2 (1) ↑ 4.1* 5.8** 11.0*** 9.3** 10.9***
AGPaseS-T1284C 5.6 (C) ↑ 6.3** 4.1* 3.4* 7.2** 10.8***
AGPaseS-A1286G 35.2 (G) 16.8*** 18.7*** 16.0** 16.2** 16.6**
INV-8/2-T2076C 36.2 (C) 37.1*** 42.6*** 34.5*** 34.0*** 28.7***
INV-8/2-T2134G 35.0 (G) ↑ 37.3*** 40.0*** 31.1*** 33.8*** 34.6***
INV-8/2-T2320C 11.2 (C) ↑ 11.6** 8.4** 8.2** 7.4* 10.6**
INV-8/2-G2182A 16.2 (A) ↑ 7.5* 5.6* ns ns ns
Pain1-8c_C552 A718d 5.0 (1) ↑ 5.0* 3.9* 7.5** 10.9*** 11.4***
InvGE-6f_A1103d 6.2 (1) ↑ 9.6** 7.8** 7.6** 12.1*** 9.3**
InvCD141-C339T (G280A, C288T, C543T, G630Ae 13.7 (T) ↓ 30.0*** 30.6*** 32.4*** 37.1*** 32.3***

ANOVA, analysis of variance; ns, not significant; SNP, single-nucleotide polymorphism; LD, linkage disequilibrium.

a

Markers, for which box plots are shown in Figure 3 are in bold letters.

b

Significance is indicated by “ns” not significant (P > 0.05), *0.05 > P ≥ 0.01, **0.01 > P ≥ 0.001 and ***P < 0.001.

c

Arrows indicate the direction of the effect of the MFA, upwards for a positive (lower sugar content) and downward for a negative effect (higher sugar content); ↑↓: direction of effect was inconsistent between genotypic groups.

d

Marker was scored by allele specific PCR assay, presence and absence of the MFA was scored as 1 and 0, respectively, without considering allele dosage.

e

SNPs in parentheses were in strong LD, showed similar associations and the same direction of effect as the SNP, for which the data are shown.