Skip to main content
. 2014 Aug 25;4(10):2023–2033. doi: 10.1534/g3.114.012690

Table 3. Pairwise SNPs and substitution rates.

Rate/SNPs G. max G. syndetika G. dolichocarpa G canescens G. tomentella D3 G. falcata G. stenophita G. cyrtoloba P. vulgaris
G. max 2066 2044 2074 2104 2094 2022 2384 8234
G. syndetika 2.49E−09 175 210 307 638 1608 2026 8353
G. dolichocarpa 2.47E−09 2.22E−09 213 303 635 1596 2032 8341
G. canescens 2.50E−09 1.04E−09 2.70E−09 322 660 1627 2054 8331
G. tomentella 2.54E−09 5.60E−10 5.53E−10 5.87E−10 687 1640 2066 8368
G. falcata 2.53E−09 8.80E−10 8.76E−10 9.11E−10 9.48E−10 1640 2074 8365
G. stenophita 2.44E−09 2.74E−09 2.72E−09 2.77E−09 2.79E−09 2.79E−09 1284 8351
G. cyrtoloba 2.88E−09 3.70E−09 3.71E−09 3.75E−09 3.77E−09 3.78E−09 2.34E−09 8616
P. vulgaris 2.72E−09 2.76E−09 2.76E−09 2.75E−09 2.77E−09 2.77E−09 2.76E−09 2.85E−09

The number of SNPs between species appears above the diagonal, and the substitution rate was calculated using histone H3D divergence dates. Substitution rates in bold represent A plastome taxa with substitution rates that appear slower because of inferred chloroplast capture.