Skip to main content
. 2014 Oct 16;9(10):e110728. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110728

Table 2. Assessment of Methodological Quality of Included Studies.

Randomizationa Similar atbaselineb Criteriaspecifiedc Assessorblindedd Allocationconcealmente Variabilityoutcomef ITAg Totalscore
Burling (1992)[67] Unknown YES YES Unknown YES YES YES 5
Marcus (1995)[55] YES YES YES Unknown Unknown YES YES 5
Donaghy (1997)[26] YES YES YES Unknown Unknown YES YES 5
Martin (1997)[68] YES YES YES Unknown YES YES NO 5
Marcus (1999)[56] YES YES YES YES Unknown YES YES 6
Huang (2000a)[52] YES YES YES YES Unknown YES NO 5
Huang (2000b)[53] YES YES YES YES Unknown YES YES 6
Li (2002) [51] YES YES YES Unknown Unknown YES YES 5
Ussher (2003)[57] YES YES YES Unknown Unknown YES YES 5
Marcus (2005)[58] YES YES YES Unknown Unknown YES YES 5
Char (2006)[65] YES YES YES YES Unknown YES YES 6
Sareen (2007) [66] YES YES YES NO Unknown YES YES 5
Prapavessis (2007)[59] YES YES YES YES Unknown YES YES 6
Ussher (2007)[60] YES YES YES YES YES YES YES 7
Kinnunen (2008)[61] YES YES YES Unknown YES YES NO 5
Vickers (2009)[27] YES YES YES Unknown YES YES NO 5
Williams (2010)[62] YES YES YES Unknown Unknown YES NO 4
Bock (2012)[63] YES YES YES Unknown Unknown YES YES 5
Whiteley (2012)[64] YES YES YES Unknown YES YES YES 6
Li (2013)[54] YES YES YES Unknown YES YES NO 5
Smelson (2013)[69] YES YES YES Unknown Unknown YES NO 4
Zhuang (2013)[39] YES YES YES Unknown YES YES NO 5
a

Was randomization performed?

b

Were the groups similar at baseline regarding important prognostic indicators?

c

Were the eligibility criteria specified?

d

Was the outcome assessor blinded?

e

Was allocation concealment adequate?

f

Were point estimates and measures of variability presented for the primary outcome measures?

g

Did the analysis include an intention to treat analysis?