Table A3.
Patient(s) | ProximalPrimerPairsa | ProximalIntervalLengthb(kb) | DistalPrimerPairsa | DistalIntervalLengthb(kb) | Comments |
AMC0110 | Table A4 | 1.5 | |||
WHT4396 | Table A4 | 1.8 | |||
WHT3935 | Both proximal and distal breakpoints are masked | ||||
WHT2943 | Table A4 | See comments | Table A6 | 2 | We initially mistook the small, 2.7-kb deletion in P5 for the P5/distal-P1 deletion but then amplified the deletion junction by using long-range PCR with primers that bracket both the 2.7-kb deletion and the P5/distal-P1 deletion (GenBank accession number AF395669) (table A8) |
WHT3410 | Table A4 | See comments | Table A6 | See comments | High-resolution breakpoint mapping was complicated, because spacer orientation in both P5 and P1.1 is reversed compared to the reference sequence (expected to be a common polymorphism); we therefore successfully attempted long-range PCR by using primers in the proximal arm of P5 and the distal arm of P1.1 (table A8) |
WHT3516, WHT3642, WHT4426, and WHT4486 | Table A6 | 1.5 | |||
AMC0111 | Table A6 | 10 | Masking by the distal arm of P1.1 precluded finer localization of distal breakpoint | ||
WHT2825 | Table A5 | 1.2 | Table A6 | 1.0 |
Table that shows primer pairs and PCR results used to refine breakpoint locations.
Lengths of intervals to which breakpoints were localized by high-resolution breakpoint mapping.