Skip to main content
. 2014 Oct 7;15:107. doi: 10.1186/s12863-014-0107-6

Table 1.

Variance analyses of five investigated traits among 33 common S42ILs and parents across the years 2012 and 2013 under control and drought treatments

Trait a SOV b DF c MS d F value P value e h 2f
RL Genotype 34 497.6 11.1 <0.001 0.72
Treatment 1 147.8 3.3 ns
Genotype × Treatment 34 110.5 2.5 <0.001
Year 1 1628.4 36.2 <0.001
Treatment × Year 1 348.5 7.7 <0.01
Replication (Year) 5 84.0 1.9 ns
RDW Genotype 34 26.5 15.2 <0.001 0.56
Treatment 1 83.1 47.6 <0.001
Genotype × Treatment 34 7.7 4.4 <0.001
Year 1 120.2 68.8 <0.001
Treatment × Year 1 17.0 9.7 <0.01
Replication (Year) 5 1.2 0.7 ns
RV Genotype 34 1999.5 15.8 <0.001 0.64
Treatment 1 6556.4 51.8 <0.001
Genotype × Treatment 34 452.4 3.6 <0.001
Year 1 17003.4 134.4 <0.001
Treatment × Year 1 2321.9 18.4 <0.001
Replication (Year) 5 67.4 0.5 ns
TIL Genotype 34 22.7 12.5 <0.001 0.76
Treatment 1 664.1 365.3 <0.001
Genotype × Treatment 34 4.4 2.4 <0.001
Year 1 16.6 9.1 <0.01
Treatment × Year 1 136.0 74.7 <0.001
Replication (Year) 5 25.1 13.8 <0.001
GH Genotype 34 15.3 536.4 <0.001 0.99
Treatment 1 0.1 0.7 ns
Genotype × Treatment 34 0.1 0.4 ns
Year 1 0.1 0.7 ns
Treatment × Year 1 0.1 0.2 ns
Replication (Year) 5 0.1 1.3 ns

aTrait: RL = Root length, RDW = Root dry weight, RV = Root volume, TIL = Tiller number per plant, GH = Growth habit.

bSources of variation.

cDegrees of freedom.

dMean sum of square.

eP-value indicates the level of significance at <0.05, <0.01 and <0.001; ns: not significant.

fHeritability.