Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Drugs. 2014 Sep;74(14):1573–1585. doi: 10.1007/s40265-014-0286-5

Table 1.

EUCAST and CLSI antifungal breakpoint comparison for major Candida species1

Antifungal
agent
MIC breakpoint (mg/L)

Candida
albicans
Candida
glabrata
Candida
krusei
Candida
parapsilosis
Candida tropicalis





S≤ R> S≤ R> S≤ R> S≤ R> S≤ R>

Anidulafungin

  EUCAST 0.03 0.03 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.002 4 0.06 0.06

  CLSI 0.25 0.5 0.12 0.25 0.25 0.5 2 4 0.25 0.5

Caspofungin

  EUCAST ND2 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND

  CLSI 0.25 0.5 0.12 0.25 0.25 0.5 2 4 0.25 0.5

Micafungin

  EUCAST 0.016 0.016 0.03 0.03 IE3 IE 0.002 2 IE IE

  CLSI 0.25 0.5 0.06 0.125 0.25 0.5 2 4 0.25 0.5
1

Adapted from Arendrup et al. [114]

2

ND- Not determined due to significant inter-laboratory variation in MIC ranges

3

IE- Insufficient evidence (IE) due to small number of cases