Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Oct 17.
Published in final edited form as: Health Aff (Millwood). 2014 Feb;33(2):283–291. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0512

Exhibit 2.

Intention-to-treat analyses for BMI, fruit and vegetable intake, perceptions of food access

Baseline Follow-up Difference-in-Difference (Unadjusted)

Difference between New Supermarket Neighborhood and Non New Supermarket Neighborhood (Unadjusted) Difference between New Supermarket Neighborhood and Non New Supermarket Neighborhood (Unadjusted) Unadjusted Adjusted

BMIa 1.00 0.54 −0.46ns -

Fruit and vegetable intake −0.16 −0.21 −0.05ns -

Perceptions of food access −1.12 0.40 1.52** 1.47**
Grocer Choice −0.57 0.004 0.58*** 0.57***
Grocer Quality −0.21 0.28 0.49*** 0.48***
F&V Choiceb −0.30 0.12 0.42*** 0.40**
F&V Qualityb −0.25 0.09 0.34* 0.33*
F&V Expenseb 0.21 −0.09 −0.30* −0.31*
a

Body Mass Index,

b

Fruit & Vegetable

***

P ≤ 0.001

**

P ≤ 0.01

*

P ≤ 0.05

nsnot statistically significant

Authors calculation based on analytical data. Adjusted analyses controlled for: age, sex, race/ethnicity, presence of children, household income, education, employment status, and mode of transport